Excerpt from, “The Harmonic Perspective of Rhythm”
Part 2 focuses on a typical Afro-Caribbean feel. Stay tuned for a post I hope to write soon about various feels typical of Mandeng Jembe music. That post may or may not disagree with some of what is said in this one! Until then, the feel described herein could be labeled a, ‘front heavy’ or ‘front swung’ quaternary feel. That is, the subdivisions in the first part of the beat are squashed together somewhat. For Part 1, with an intro and discussion of Afro-Brazilian feel, go here.
Afro-Caribbean Feel
(Efrain) Toro’s concept of Afro-Caribbean feel—that of the folkloric music of Cuba and Puerto Rico especially—is likewise based on the interaction of binary and ternary subdivisions In this case, however, he says that it is interaction of the first two triplet partials with the offbeat sixteenth notes that describes the characteristic feel:
Figure 1. Toro’s Afro-Caribbean Feel Formula.
Audio Example 1. Computer Generated
Afro-Caribbean Feel Formula (CD Track 36).
To Cuba…Almost
In
order to test this model, I first turned the work of Olavo Alén, (Alén 1995) who did timing
measurements on Tumba Francesa rhythms in the regions of Santiago de
Cuba and Guantanamo in the Eastern part of Cuba. However, as he did not include
his raw data in the published paper, and since he worked primarily in rhythms
conceptualized in a ternary metre[1], I decided to produce data of
my own. I used the introduction of a recording of Los Muñequitos de Matanzas,
called “Oyelo de Nuevo.” (Los Muñequitos de Matanzas 1994) My reasons for this are the
following: 1) When talking of Afro-Caribbean feel (Toro’s preferred
terminology, though many would say Afro-Cuban), the music of Cuba has been at
the heart of that broadly inclusive traditional landscape, both historically,
and stylistically; 2) the Cuban Rumba is widely considered one of the
most influential genres in Afro-Caribbean folkloric music and popular music; 3)
the Rumba is characterized as having an ‘in the cracks’ feel; (Hernandez 2000; Toro 1993a; Peñalosa and Greenwood 2009;
Goines and Ameen 1993) 4) Los Muñequitos has
been one of the premier recording Rumba groups since their debut in
1956; 4) the beginning of a Rumba often includes the three conga (in
Spanish, tumbadora) players demonstrating the sixteenth note feel in
unison with a rocking, ‘heel-toe’ motion of the hands; this introduction is not
obligatory but seems to be a call to group acknowledgement of the underlying
feel before the separation into the several parts that fit together
rhythmically to create, with vocals and other small percussion instruments, the
overall Rumba sound. Such is the case with the beginning of “Oyelo de
Nuevo[2].” This rocking sixteenth motion
is reminiscent of the way Toro showed the feel to me, as well as my own
experiences with folkloric Rumba from the early 1990s onward; it is the basis
of the segundo, or middle drum, accompaniment in the Matanzas style.
As Cuban Rumba was not the primary focus of this study, it was not feasible to travel to Cuba or some other location where an ‘authentic’ Rumba group could be found. Such a recording would make for a larger data sample, more easily processed through multi-track recordings, with different input from each instrument. Nevertheless, I was able to gather timing data on the basic feel as indicated by the players in their introduction. It should be clear from the aforementioned discussions that it is not my objective to ‘prove’ Toro’s theory about feel, for the theory itself is built on the a priori assumption that human musical activity is by its very nature not in conformance to certain quantitative parameters; it is, in Toro’s view, imperfect, like nature. (“But nature doesn’t happen by subdivision.” (Toro 2012j)) My intention here is to evaluate his archetypal model in light of some sample material to see what observations this process might generate.
Data Collection and Analysis
I
imported the recording into the Pro Tools platform, and, using a combination of
listening, knowledge of the music, and visual waveform data, put markers at
each subdivision as articulated in the introductory section described above. I
then exported the timing data, with the marker names (Clave 2, Beat 1.2, etc.)
and put it into a spreadsheet where I calculated subdivision and cumulative
timings as with the Brazilian data. I chose to work this time in percentages,
rather than NUTs, similar to approach taken by Polak. (Polak 2010) In this way, the articulations
can be compared as percentages of the total beat, both for individual
subdivision length or cumulative position within the beat, rather than
fractions of 400 NUTs. The data remained in millisecond accuracy, up to the
calculations of percentages.
The
length of the extract was about 10 seconds, or about five clave cycles, until
the entrance of the voices and separate drum parts would make determination of
individual subdivision strikes impossible.
As
with the Brazilian data, I found that the Afro-Caribbean harmonic timing model
seemed to offer the right shape, but with extremes of timing variation that act
more like points of gravity, competing with the gravity of even sixteenth
timing.
Figure 2. Los Muñequitos Intro Marcha, Average Timing.
I
think it is reasonable to assume that even sixteenth timing is the conceptual
model offering the backdrop from which the performers operate, but that it is
warped by the ternary pull. This is likely a result of the performers’
experience with more clearly ternary-based music, whether the influence is
motional, aural, or a combination of the two. Much Afro-Cuban folkloric music,
both sacred and secular, operates from a primarily ternary feel, as do its West
African root styles. Although not usually cited as a direct root of Cuban
music, of the Mandeng jembe rhythms discussed earlier, in Keïta’s and
Billmeier’s choice of 62 rhythms 61% were presented and transcribed in a
ternary feel. In my personal experience with Congolese folkloric, and Yoruba
Dundun drumming, both cited as primary influences on the music of Cuba, (Malabe and Weiner 1990; Hernandez 2000; Peñalosa and
Greenwood 2009; Mauleón 2011) there was also an
approximately even split between binary and ternary feels.
Similar in Conception, Slightly Different in Execution
But
are these just wobbles in the accuracy of the timing or do they confirm the
influence of the harmonic conception according to Toro’s model? Other research
of this sort indicates that, although there are clear individual and stylistic
differences, the patterns of variation from the mechanical norm demonstrated
regularity and by extension, intentionality. (Polak 2010; Gerischer 2006; Alén 1995; Benadon 2006;
Bengston 1977) Likewise the data
presented in this study has also shown each beat to have similar patterns of
variability about the mid-line representing mechanical or metronomic timing. As
for the relevance of Toro’s models, I decided to compare the two to decide if
there appears to be a better fit between each model and the data from its
relevant culture area.
Figure 3. Harmonic Models and
Empirical Data.
Although difficult to take in at first, by looking at the lines in pairs—red and green, yellow and puce—it is clear that the data and the models match in relative shape. That is, the highs and lows occur in nearly the same positions on the horizontal axis. Interestingly, the data lines—Los Munequitos and pandeiro (green and puce)—also match quite well; better, in fact than either does with its relevant model. Each shows short durations on the second subdivision (‘e’), as do both models, and longer durations for the last subdivision (‘a’), as does the Brazilian model. They differ, however, for durations of the first, and especially the third (‘&’). This third position is where the models are also farthest apart in their predictions, well above and below the middle line. Examining them once again, it appears that indeed the Afro-Caribbean model has a very long middle subdivision, more than 33%[3], a whole triplet partial, and the Brazilian model, conversely, a very short one:
Figures
4 and 5. Afro-Caribbean and
Afro-Brazilian Harmonic Models Reference.
Looking
at the cumulative timing values, as before, we see a similar trend:
Figure 6. Cumulative Average
Timing Values Comparison.
Here,
from another perspective, it can be seen that the data lines—green and puce—are
similar in form but that where separate, each is nearer to its respective
model—green near red and puce near yellow. Also, both data lines peak
considerably below the 75% mark; each one has a short subdivision earlier in
the beat which pulls everything back and leaves a gap at the end which
manifests as a long, near triplet last subdivision. Looking at figure 7.70
again and comparing to the middle, mechanical timing line, we see that both
sets of data have near sixteenth note first subdivisions, relatively short
second subdivisions, as both models predict, relatively long and short third
subdivisions for the Afro-Caribbean and Brazilian lines, respectively, as the
models predict, and relatively long last subdivisions for both, as one of the models
predicts. Though the Afro-Caribbean model predicts even timing for the last
subdivision and the data showed they were longer, the Brazilian data showed
still longer final subdivisions—more toward its model.
The Ears Have It
What all this means to me is that Toro’s ears and his intuition are relatively correct. The data sets are too small to make grand pronouncements about the nature of these two rhythmic feels, from these two large culture areas. Likewise, the variability is such that I have avoided statistically powerful terminology like ‘correlation’, and ‘degrees of certainty’. In fact, Toro’s conception is so broad, and flexible, it is hard or impossible to evaluate ‘scientifically’. However, I still find it significant because we are concerned not with exactness but with perspective. When approaching a new or ‘slippery’ feel then, these two models, or others developed by other theorists and/or performers for other feels, can indeed offer a foothold or a foundation from which to explore the more particular nuances. This ‘nuance level’ of comprehension will always be grasped by the finer capacity of the senses (or the computer, through recording and data analysis).
From
this framework will our understanding be richer? Our potential more? Although a
basic poly-metric grid will never approach the detailed interpretation possible
to a sensitive aural specialist (as we all are, to some degree), conceptual
engagement might also help and encourage us to preserve what might otherwise be
lost in a world increasingly predominated by a linear aesthetic.
The sound of music is unique to that culture and it is perceived in the 4 and 6 frequencies because 2 and 3 are too big. Here is where all the cultures make their own sound. For practical purposes the space between 4 and 6, how close or how loose they are played in the specific style of music, defines its sound.
Ethnic musicians don’t know what they are doing. They do it because they grew up doing it but they don’t have a point of view about what they are doing.
If you don’t know what you do then you can only play the patterns you’ve learned!
This is the way we all learned things and once in a while there is (a) Picasso, Einstein, Feynman, Debussy but one in a million… because they know what’s happening they can play around with it. (Toro 2011b)
[1] The formula in question
applies to a binary feel, but others have shown various ternary feels to also
be non-isochronous. (Polak 2010; Alén 1995; Benadon 2006; Bengston 1977)
[2] This approach is similar to
that of Polak, who, working with Jembe players in Mali, used the ‘echauffement‘
(‘heating up’) section of the soloists’ performances to gather and hypothesize
about timing data. This section likewise consists of all main beats and
subdivisions played throughout several iterations of the metric cycle. (Polak 2010)
[3] In fact it is 42%, the
difference between the 33% of the second triplet subdivision and 75% of the
last sixteenth.
Bibliography
As you’ve seen in the text, I have included links to most of these works. If you are interested in purchasing any of them, please consider clicking through and helping to support this labor of love. Thank you! YIR (Yours In Rhythm), John
Billmeier, U., & Keïta, M. (2004). Mamady Keïta: A Life for the Djembé: Traditional Rhythms of the Malinke. Germany: Arun.
Malabe, F., & Weiner, B. (1990). Afro-Cuban Rhythms for Drumset. New York: Manhattan Music.
Mauleón, R. (2011). The Salsa Guidebook. Petaluma, California: Sher Music.
Peñalosa, D., & Greenwood, P. (2009). The Clave Matrix: Afro-Cuban Rhythm: Its Principles and African Origins. Redway, California: Bembe Books.
Gerischer, C. (2006). O Suingue Baiano: Rhythmic Feeling and Microrhythmic Phenomena in Brazilian Percussion. Ethnomusicology, 50(1), 99–119.
Goines, L., & Ameen, R. (1993). Funkeando la Clave: Influencias de Ritmos Afro-Cubanos Para Bajo Y Bateria. Alfred Publishing Company, Incorporated.
Hernandez, H. (2000). Conversations in Clave: The Ultimate Technical Study of Four-Way Independence in Afro-Cuban Rhythms. Van Nuys, California: Alfred Publishing Co., Inc.
Los Muñequitos de Matanzas. (1994). Oyelos de Nuevo. Qbadisk.
Toro, E. (2012, September). Lesson, 21 September, 2012. Music Lesson, UKZN.